Plastic versus Siliconized Glass Tubes: Evaluation in Current Laboratory Practice

Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.

Facebook Linkedin Weibo

Thromb Haemost 2000; 83(05): 800-801
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613908

Letters to the Editor

Schattauer GmbH

C. Biron-Andréani

¹From the Laboratoire Central d’Hématologie, Montpellier, France

,

C. Mallol

¹From the Laboratoire Central d’Hématologie, Montpellier, France

,

F. Séguret

²Département d’Informatique Médicale, Hôpital Universitaire, Montpellier, France

,

J.-F. Schved

¹From the Laboratoire Central d’Hématologie, Montpellier, France

Further Information

Publication History

Received 11 August 1999

Accepted after resubmission 22 December 1999

Publication Date:
08 December 2017 (online)

References
1 Thomson JM. Blood collection and preparation: prenalytical variation. In: Jepersen J, Bertina RM, Haverkate F. eds. ECAT assay procedures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992: 13-20.

MissingFormLabel
Search in Google Scholar
2 Intraclass correlation. In: Zar JH. Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd edition. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey; Englewood Cliffs: 1984: 323-5.

MissingFormLabel
Search in Google Scholar
3 Pollack B, Barro C, Pernod G, Bourgeat P, Vigier JP. Impact of the blood coagulation tube on the activation of coagulation. Thromb Haemost 1997; 07: 217-8.

MissingFormLabel
Thieme Connect PubMed Search in Google Scholar
4 Van den Besselaar AMHP, Meeuwisse-Braun J, Witteveen E, van Meegen E. Effect of evacuated blood collection tubes on thromboplastin calibration. Thromb Haemost 1998; 79: 1062-3.

MissingFormLabel
Thieme Connect PubMed Search in Google Scholar